Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Eigenvectör (Again?)
I know, this is getting way too tedious and repetitive. But I feel the need to clarify something. The name of the radio show is Eigenvectör, not Eigenvectōr, as I wrote the other day. An umlaut is a pair of dots, not a line. A minor detail but details matter, don't they? Of course they do!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
.jpg)
2 comments:
Heh, heh!
There are a few of us that have
discovered an appreciation for
repetition. Seems like that's the
only way i can get something right.
Do it over and over and over..
Did i finish that sentence with an
umlaut? Seriously, thanks for explaining what an umlaut is, I hadn't gotten around to looking up the definition. I did however read a bit about eigenvectors and eigenvalues, but once again, i would have to be very repetitive in
the study of these things to get a
good mental grasp. (At the moment,I'm slipping!)
The radio show was refreshing. I thought there was something there for most anyone to appreciate. Not bad at all for a couple of math nerds. I'll certainly tune back in whenever it's possible.
May life treat you well,
Oh, Dale! I am glad to know you find value in tedium, too. And now it's off to study, the only way I am going to pass this confounded test. It's the one that makes or breaks me in this program, a comprehensive final of everything we've studied so far, 200 questions.
Your comment made me want to hear this song again.
Post a Comment